Author Archives: James F. Albrecht

Crime Prevention

Crime Prevention

Crime Prevention Units

In line with Steven P. Lab

about Crime Prevention in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Throughout most of history, preventing crime and responding to criminal behavior was the purview of the victim, his or her family, and community residents. There was no police force (or criminal justice system, for that matter) as we know it today. The earliest responses to crime included retribution and revenge on the part of the victim and his or her family. Indeed, the earliest laws outlined the role of the victim in addressing crimes (there is more information about criminal law in the American Legal Encyclopedia and about crimes and criminals vocabulary). The Code of Hammurabi (approximately 1900 BCE), for example, outlined retribution by the victim and/or the family as the accepted response to injurious behavior. Lex talionis , the principle of “an eye for an eye,” was specifically set forth as a driving principle in the Hammurabic law. Such laws and practices provided legitimacy to individual citizen action. The existence of formal systems of social control is relatively new.

Transportation Security Administration

Transportation Security Administration

Transportation Security Administration

In line with Marvie Brooks

about Transportation Security Administration in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA), signed into law by President George W. Bush on November 19, 200l (Pub. L. No. 107-01), established the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) within the Department of Transportation. The TSA, the creation of which was a direct result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent demands for a higher level of security at domestic airports, is responsible for securing the movement of people and commerce in all modes of transportation-aviation, maritime, and land-as well as for leading research and development into security technology to aid in safeguarding the nation's transportation facilities and infrastructure. In March 2003, the TSA was moved to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as part of the Border and Security Directorate, which was intended to integrate into one agency all government operations for securing United States borders and transportation systems.

Amber Alert

Amber Alert

Amber Alert

In line with Mara Sullivan

about Amber Alert in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The AMBER Alert is a voluntary partnership between law enforcement agencies, media, and others to distribute an urgent bulletin in the most serious child abduction cases. It was created in 1996 as a response to the kidnapping and murder of a nine-year-old girl, Amber Hagerman, by a stranger in Arlington, Texas. The acronym stands for America's Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response. The goal of the AMBER plan is to involve the entire community to help assist in the safe return of abducted children by publicizing the abduction. After law enforcement has confirmed a missing child report, an AMBER Alert is sent to media outlets such as radio stations, television stations, cable companies, Internet bulletin boards, and electronic highway billboards. Since its inception, the AMBER Alert has been an important and successful tool in rescuing kidnapped children in the states that voluntarily participate in the program.

Department of Commerce

Department of Commerce

National Marine Fisheries Service of the Department of Commerce

In line with Katherine B. Killoran

about Department of Commerce in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The mission of National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), sometimes referred to as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries, is to develop and enforce domestic fisheries regulations as specified by federal law, international agreements, and treaties. NMFS monitors both foreign and domestic compliance with these regulations inside the 200-mile United States Exclusive Economic Zone. The NMFS is committed to a sustainable use philosophy that attempts to balance commercial interests and recreational interests while preserving the health of United States marine resources. The NMFS Office for Law Enforcement (OLE) protects both commercial and recreational fishery resources, marine mammals, and other threatened or endangered species and manages the NOAA's 13 National Marine Sanctuaries. The NMFS receives an annual budget of approximately $700 million, with more than $50 million earmarked for enforcement and surveillance activities.

Mincey v. Arizona

Mincey v. Arizona

Mincey v. Arizona as a Leading U.S. Case

Mincey v. Arizona is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Mincey v. Arizona may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Mincey v. Arizona tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Mincey v. Arizona is also explained, together with the relevance of Mincey v. Arizona impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Mincey v. Arizona

437 U.S. 385 (1978)

Terrorist Groups

Terrorist Groups

Domestic Terrorist Groups

In line with Steven Chermak & Jeff Gruenewald

about Terrorist Groups in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Public concern about international terrorism changed dramatically after al Qaeda successfully attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Although it was the most significant mass casualty terror attack in the history of the United States of America, it was not the first. As recently as 9 years ago, Timothy McVeigh, a right-wing extremist who has been called the American (United States) Terrorist (Michel & Herbeck, 2001), destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, killing 168 people and injuring many more. This attack, like the September 11, 2001, attacks, shocked the public and changed people's concerns about terrorism. In order to understand terrorism and the threat of terror, it is important to consider both international and domestic threats. This entry focuses on the latter. This discussion serves as an overview of domestic terrorism in America.

Foreign Terrorist Groups

In line with Adam Dulin

about Terrorist Groups in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The term terrorism is rooted in the French Revolution during Maximilien Robespierre's reign of terror, a period when potential enemies of the government were ruthlessly exterminated. Terrorism itself is much older than the origins of the term. For example, the Assassins, a group related to mainstream Shiite Muslims in Iran, committed acts of terrorism more than 1,000 years ago. Likewise, the Thugs of India terrorized travelers in ritualistic fashion for more than three centuries. There is no single accepted definition of what constitutes terrorism. More than 100 definitions have been offered by academe and law enforcement agencies through decades of research. The pejorative nature of the term, as well as the politics involved in designating an act of violence as terrorism, contribute to the difficulty in developing a single definition.

Search Warrants

Search Warrants

Search Warrants

In line with Adam J. McKee

about Search Warrants in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

A search warrant is a judicial order authorizing agents of the government to search a home or other place. A law enforcement officer seeking a warrant must generally file an application with a competent court. Among the warrant application materials submitted is an affidavit detailing the information known to the police that supports the allegation that a crime has been committed. A search warrant is issued at an ex parte hearing, meaning that the defendant does not have a right to attend or even know the hearing has taken place. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides most of the controlling principles regarding search warrants.

Missouri v. Seibert

Missouri v. Seibert

Missouri v. Seibert as a Leading U.S. Case

Missouri v. Seibert is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Missouri v. Seibert may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Missouri v. Seibert tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Missouri v. Seibert is also explained, together with the relevance of Missouri v. Seibert impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Missouri v. Seibert

542 U.S. 600 (2004)

Parole

Parole

Parole Officers

In line with Michael Jacobson

about Parole in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Like probation officers, parole officers must balance two roles: cop and social worker. These roles, often in conflict with each other, are at the heart of what constitutes the job of a parole officer. More so than probation officers, parole agents have a greater law enforcement orientation. Everyone they supervise has already been to prison, and many have been convicted of violent offenses. In 1999, one fourth of everyone on parole supervision had been sentenced to prison for a violent crime, another 33% were drug offenders, and 31% were property offenders (Bureau of Justice Statistics, n.d.). By the end of 2002, there were more than 750,000 people under parole supervision in the United States of America. During that same year, about 470,000 people were released from prison and placed on parole (Glaze, 2003).

Women

Women

Women in Federal Agency Law Enforcement

In line with Dorothy Moses Schulz

about Women in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The modern history of women special agents in federal law enforcement agencies began in 1971, when President Richard M. Nixon issued Executive Order No. 11478. The order, Equal Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government, prohibited discrimination in employment at the federal level because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap, or age and effectively ended the ban on employing women in the title of special agent. It also opened up to women positions in GS-1811 status, or criminal investigative positions, from which they had previously been barred. Agencies that hired women that same year included the Secret Service and the Postal Inspection Service. Others, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), did not implement this change until 1972.

Women in Federal Law Enforcement

In line with Dorothy Moses Schulz

about Women in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Women in Federal Law Enforcement (WIFLE) began in 1978 as the Interagency Committee on Women in Federal Law Enforcement (ICWIFLE), a task forced formed by the United States Office of Personnel Management to study the reasons women were not becoming or remaining federal law enforcement officers. In 1983 its sponsorship was transferred to the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury, with each agency represented by a cochair. In June 1999, leaders of the group decided to achieve greater independence by incorporating outside the interagency committee and changed the group's name to Women in Federal Law Enforcement.