Category Archives: B

Brendlin v. California

Brendlin v. California

Brendlin v. California as a Leading U.S. Case

Brendlin v. California is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Brendlin v. California may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Brendlin v. California tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Brendlin v. California is also explained, together with the relevance of Brendlin v. California impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Brendlin v. California

551 U.S. 1 (2007)

Body Armor

Body Armor

Body Armor

In line with Barbara Goldman Carrel

about Body Armor in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Deputy Sheriff Isaac Smith, the first law enforcement officer to lose his life in the line of duty, was fatally shot in 1792. Yet it was not until April 2,1931, that one of the first demonstrations of ballistic wear for the personal protection of law enforcement personnel was documented by Washington, D.C.'s Evening Star . Unfortunately, most ballistic-resistant designs of the time were neither effective nor practical for everyday police use. Due to the dramatic rise in officer fatalities from handguns during the 1960s, the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, predecessor of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), instituted a program to create lightweight body armor for police personnel. In the 1970s, government researchers Lester Shubin and Nicholas Montanarelli tested DuPont's new Kevlar ® plastic fabric (invented to replace steel belting in radial tires) for its ballistic resistance potential.

Bond v. United States

Bond v. United States

Bond v. United States as a Leading U.S. Case

Bond v. United States is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Bond v. United States may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Bond v. United States tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Bond v. United States is also explained, together with the relevance of Bond v. United States impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Bond v. United States

529 U.S. 334 (2000)

Bumper v. North Carolina

Bumper v. North Carolina

Bumper v. North Carolina as a Leading U.S. Case

Bumper v. North Carolina is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Bumper v. North Carolina may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Bumper v. North Carolina tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Bumper v. North Carolina is also explained, together with the relevance of Bumper v. North Carolina impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Bumper v. North Carolina

391 U.S. 543 (1968)

Bail Agent

Bail Agent

Bondsman or Bail Agent

In line with Dennis Alan Bartlett

about Bail Agent in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Bail is the means by which the United States criminal justice system permits the release of a defendant from custody while ensuring his appearance at all required court proceedings. Bail (from the French bailler , to deliver) is the legacy of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence wherein defendants were delivered to their sureties, who gave security for their appearance. Current practice allows a number of kinds of bail, the most common of which are the following: 1. Deposit bail, usually 10% of the face amount of the bond, deposited with the court, returnable to the defendant upon making required appearances. 2. Own recognizance release, wherein the defendant is released on his or her promise to appear, but liable for the full amount of the bail should he or she default in appearing. 3. Financially secured release through a commercial surety, called a bondsman or bail agent.

Briscoe v. LaHue

Briscoe v. LaHue

Briscoe v. LaHue as a Leading U.S. Case

Briscoe v. LaHue is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Briscoe v. LaHue may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Briscoe v. LaHue tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Briscoe v. LaHue is also explained, together with the relevance of Briscoe v. LaHue impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Briscoe v. LaHue

460 U.S. 325 (1983)

Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown

Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown

Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown as a Leading U.S. Case

Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown is also explained, together with the relevance of Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown

520 U.S. 397 (1997)

Brower v. County of Inyo

Brower v. County of Inyo

Brower v. County of Inyo as a Leading U.S. Case

Brower v. County of Inyo is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Brower v. County of Inyo may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Brower v. County of Inyo tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Brower v. County of Inyo is also explained, together with the relevance of Brower v. County of Inyo impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Brower v. County of Inyo

489 U.S. 593 (1989)

Bureau

Bureau

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives

In line with Genevieve Guy

about Bureau in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATF), located within the Department of Justice (DOJ), has the statutory mandate to enforce federal firearms laws, investigate arsons and explosive device incidents and thefts, and prevent the diversion into illegal markets of alcohol and tobacco products. The agency, which traces its history to 1789, when the first Congress imposed a tax on imported alcohol, has undergone numerous reorganizations since that time; the last one occurred in 2003, when the former Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, which has tax collecting, regulatory, and enforcement responsibilities, was transferred to the DOJ under homeland security legislation and when certain of the BATF's tax and trade functions were separated from the larger agency and retained within the Treasury Department as the new Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).

Bureau of Engraving and Printing Police

In line with David P. Schulz

about Bureau in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) was created July 11, 1862, as part of the Treasury Department, although it was not until October 1, 1887, that the production of all United States paper currency and government securities was centralized in one facility. Among the bureau's responsibilities are the design, printing, and finishing of the country's paper currency, many postage stamps, Treasury notes, and other securities and certificates. In addition, the BEP prints military identification cards and invitations to White House functions. The bureau is also called on to provide advice and assistance to other government agencies in designing and producing documents such as securities and certificates, which require security or anticounterfeiting characteristics. The BEP facilities are protected on a 24-hour, 7-day-a-week basis. These include the headquarters offices and manufacturing operations in Washington, D.C., and an additional plant in Fort Worth, Texas.

Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

In line with George Weissinger

about Bureau in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, led law enforcement agencies at every level of government to reevaluate their strategies with regard to preventing future terrorism and to consider their preparedness in the event of other attacks. Perhaps no other agency was more sensitive to the events of September 11 than the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). All of the hijackers were aliens as well as technically in violation of immigration laws. In response to the attacks, President George W. Bush and Congress created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on March 1, 2003. Special agents of the INS and Customs Service were transferred to DHS under the Border and Transportation Security Directorate. Within that directorate the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was designed to be the primary agency to enforce the immigration laws inside the United States of America.

Bureau of Industry and Security

In line with David Schulz

about Bureau in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The United States Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is responsible for regulating the export of sensitive goods and technology for reasons of national security, foreign policy, and compliance with nonproliferation agreements. Formerly known as the Bureau of Export Administration, BIS has an Office of Export Enforcement (OEE), sometimes referred to as the export police, to help prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and conventional arms, to combat international terrorism, and to implement United States economic sanctions and embargoes. The activities of the export police, though, cover an even wider range of goods and activities. They are responsible for enforcing controls that, for instance, include items that might seem obvious, such as nuclear materials, space propulsion systems, certain chemicals, and microorganisms and toxins, as well as items that may not seem so obvious, such as polygraphs, specialized sensors and lasers, and some types of police equipment.

Bureau of Land Management Law Enforcement

In line with David Schulz

about Bureau in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Part of the Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is responsible for 264 million acres of public lands located primarily in 12 Western states, including Alaska, as well as management of 700 million acres of subsurface mineral estates throughout the country. Use of public lands includes recreation, livestock grazing, and energy and mineral development, and the bureau's mission includes conserving and protecting natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. Recreational uses include the activities of outdoors enthusiasts as well as organized events that include weddings, public gatherings such as the Burning Man Festival in Nevada, and competitive events like dogsled and off-highway vehicle races. The bureau's law enforcement personnel are very active in policing off-highway vehicle use in Southern California, including, but not limited to, the Imperial San Dunes, El Mirage, and Dumont Dunes recreation areas.

Bureau of Reclamation, Office of Security, Safety, and Law Enforcement

In line with David Schulz

about Bureau in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Bureau of Reclamation gained new responsibilities in the post-September 11, 2001, concerns over terrorism. The century-old agency-which had long been concerned with constructing dams, irrigation canals, reservoirs, and hydroelectric plants-was charged with bolstering protection of these sites. Prior to September 11, 2001, the bureau lacked authority to enforce federal laws at its sites and facilities, except at Hoover Dam in Nevada. Its entire police force consisted of 13 uniformed officers. The bureau, sometimes abbreviated BOR and usually referred to as Reclamation, was created with passage of the Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902, when Congress addressed demands from settlers in western states and territories for assistance in the transportation and storage of water. Originally knows as the Reclamation Service, it was part of the United States Geological Survey and was charged with reviewing potential water development projects in each western state with federal lands.

Berghuis v. Thompkins

Berghuis v. Thompkins

Berghuis v. Thompkins as a Leading U.S. Case

Berghuis v. Thompkins is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Berghuis v. Thompkins may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Berghuis v. Thompkins tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Berghuis v. Thompkins is also explained, together with the relevance of Berghuis v. Thompkins impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Berghuis v. Thompkins

560 U.S. 370 (2010)