Category Archives: J

Juvenile crimes

Leave a reply

Juvenile crimes

Juvenile crimes/Programs/Units

In line with Holly Hurban

about Juvenile crimes in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Juvenile crime has occurred for centuries, as has the debate regarding the age of criminal responsibility. Before the 20th century, punishment consisted of severe discipline, and children were seen more as property than as people. In the United States of America, juveniles have been treated differently from adults in the criminal justice system for only a little over 100 years, but even today, states differ about the age of responsibility for various juvenile crimes (there is more information about criminal law in the American Legal Encyclopedia and about crimes and criminals vocabulary). By the early 20th century, all of the states had established separate juvenile courts under the parens patriae doctrine. Parens patriae establishes the role of law enforcement and the criminal justice system as a protective entity commissioned to rehabilitate delinquent youth. Juveniles act differently from adults because of a variety of developmental reasons, such as immaturity and inexperience. As a result, juveniles are sometimes held to different legal expectations and punishments.

Joint Task Forces

Leave a reply

Joint Task Forces

Joint Task Forces

In line with Katherine M. Newbold

about Joint Task Forces in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The fragmented nature of federal law enforcement has meant that different agencies have different areas of responsibility. Although various agencies may enforce different laws and concentrate on different crimes (there is more information about criminal law in the American Legal Encyclopedia and about crimes and criminals vocabulary), criminal acts have always crossed jurisdictional boundaries, whether defined by geography or statutory functions. Joint task forces emerged in the 1970s as a management tool to overcome the autonomy of law enforcement agencies. A task force is any group of officers who are employed by different agencies assigned to work together on a specific case or specific types of cases. In addition to personnel, agencies forming task forces may commit other resources, including investigative records, surveillance equipment, clerical support, and such common tools as vehicles, telephones, and office space for the task force to use.

Jacobson v. United States

Leave a reply

Jacobson v. United States

Jacobson v. United States as a Leading U.S. Case

Jacobson v. United States is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Jacobson v. United States may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Jacobson v. United States tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Jacobson v. United States is also explained, together with the relevance of Jacobson v. United States impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Jacobson v. United States

503 U.S. 540 (1992)

J.D.B v. North Carolina

Leave a reply

J.D.B v. North Carolina

J.D.B v. North Carolina as a Leading U.S. Case

J.D.B v. North Carolina is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, J.D.B v. North Carolina may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about J.D.B v. North Carolina tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of J.D.B v. North Carolina is also explained, together with the relevance of J.D.B v. North Carolina impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of J.D.B v. North Carolina

564 U.S. —, No. 09-11211 (2011)