Category Archives: O

Oliver v. United States

Leave a reply

Oliver v. United States

Oliver v. United States as a Leading U.S. Case

Oliver v. United States is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Oliver v. United States may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Oliver v. United States tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Oliver v. United States is also explained, together with the relevance of Oliver v. United States impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Oliver v. United States

466 U.S. 170 (1984)

Organized Crime Control

Leave a reply

Organized Crime Control

Organized Crime Control

In line with Ronald Goldstsock

about Organized Crime Control in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

There is no consensus on the definition of the term organized crime , but it is generally thought of as either a business that primarily engages in an ongoing pattern of illicit activity, or a syndicate that regulates the operations of such businesses. Frequently, the notion of structure and the ability and willingness to use force and corruption to attain economic advantage are seen as indispensable attributes of such businesses or groups. Today, the term Mafia , which properly refers to a specific group indigenous to Sicily (and that is also known as “the Mob”), is often used generically to refer to any group engaged in organized crime or, indeed, other conspiratorial behavior. Although there were, and currently are, numerous other criminal syndicates, United States law enforcement tended historically to focus on Italian American (United States) groups and developed its approach to combating organized crime from its experiences in doing so.

Ohio v. Robinette

Leave a reply

Ohio v. Robinette

Ohio v. Robinette as a Leading U.S. Case

Ohio v. Robinette is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Ohio v. Robinette may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Ohio v. Robinette tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Ohio v. Robinette is also explained, together with the relevance of Ohio v. Robinette impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Ohio v. Robinette

519 U.S. 33 (1996)

Oregon v. Elstad

Leave a reply

Oregon v. Elstad

Oregon v. Elstad as a Leading U.S. Case

Oregon v. Elstad is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Oregon v. Elstad may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Oregon v. Elstad tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Oregon v. Elstad is also explained, together with the relevance of Oregon v. Elstad impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Oregon v. Elstad

470 U.S. 298 (1985)

Owen v. City of Independence

Leave a reply

Owen v. City of Independence

Owen v. City of Independence as a Leading U.S. Case

Owen v. City of Independence is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Owen v. City of Independence may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Owen v. City of Independence tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Owen v. City of Independence is also explained, together with the relevance of Owen v. City of Independence impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Owen v. City of Independence

445 U.S. 622 (1980)

On Lee v. United States

Leave a reply

On Lee v. United States

On Lee v. United States as a Leading U.S. Case

On Lee v. United States is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, On Lee v. United States may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about On Lee v. United States tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of On Lee v. United States is also explained, together with the relevance of On Lee v. United States impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of On Lee v. United States

343 U.S. 747 (1952)

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Leave a reply

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)

In line with David P. Schulz

about Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) created the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement-usually abbreviated OSM, though sometimes abbreviated OSMRE in government publications. Operating as part of the Department of the Interior, the office has two missions. One is overseeing coal mining activity to ensure that both people and the environment are protected during mining activity and that land is restored to beneficial use when mining operations are completed. The second mission, through the Abandoned Mine Land program, is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare by correcting problems associated with past mining practices such as underground fires, acid mine drainage, subsidences, landslides, highwalls, and open shafts. With fewer than 525 employees across the country, the office partners with 31 states and a number of Native American (United States) tribes that exercise responsibility for enforcing, permitting, and bonding.

Olmstead v. United States

Leave a reply

Olmstead v. United States

Olmstead v. United States as a Leading U.S. Case

Olmstead v. United States is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Olmstead v. United States may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Olmstead v. United States tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Olmstead v. United States is also explained, together with the relevance of Olmstead v. United States impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Olmstead v. United States

277 U.S. 438 (1928)

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act

Leave a reply

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act

In line with John D. Beckmann

about Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, signed into law on June 19, 1968, by President Lyndon B. Johnson, was intended to assist state and local governments in improving the coordination and effectiveness of criminal justice systems throughout the United States of America. Reflecting the views of the president, Congress, and others that crime was an issue best handled by state and local governments, the law nonetheless brought the federal government into local crime control in ways the country had not seen since Prohibition. A large portion of the Safe Streets Act dealt with providing federal funds to local police. Title I established a Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, which authorized the United States

Office of National Drug Control Policy

Leave a reply

Office of National Drug Control Policy

Office of National Drug Control Policy

In line with David F. Musto

about Office of National Drug Control Policy in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) was created by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. It is the most recent organization established to oversee and plan for the funding, coordination, and evaluation of federal government antidrug activities. The concept of designating a central person or agency as the leading authority on drugs in the federal government dates back to Dr. Hamilton Wright, the State Department's opium commissioner from 1906 to 1914. Wright coordinated efforts in the private and public sectors that eventually, in 1914, led to the Harrison Narcotic Act, the basic antiopiate and anticocaine law of the United States of America until the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. In 1920, Levi G. Nutt was given responsibility for enforcement of the Harrison Act. He was appointed head of the Treasury Department's Narcotic Field Force, a division of the Prohibition Bureau.