Tag Archives: BR

Brendlin v. California

Brendlin v. California

Brendlin v. California as a Leading U.S. Case

Brendlin v. California is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Brendlin v. California may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Brendlin v. California tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Brendlin v. California is also explained, together with the relevance of Brendlin v. California impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Brendlin v. California

551 U.S. 1 (2007)

Briscoe v. LaHue

Briscoe v. LaHue

Briscoe v. LaHue as a Leading U.S. Case

Briscoe v. LaHue is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Briscoe v. LaHue may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Briscoe v. LaHue tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Briscoe v. LaHue is also explained, together with the relevance of Briscoe v. LaHue impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Briscoe v. LaHue

460 U.S. 325 (1983)

Brower v. County of Inyo

Brower v. County of Inyo

Brower v. County of Inyo as a Leading U.S. Case

Brower v. County of Inyo is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Brower v. County of Inyo may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Brower v. County of Inyo tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Brower v. County of Inyo is also explained, together with the relevance of Brower v. County of Inyo impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Brower v. County of Inyo

489 U.S. 593 (1989)

Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act

Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act

Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act

In line with Kimberly D. Hassell

about Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

In 1987, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Brady Bill) was introduced in Congress. President William J. Clinton signed the Brady Bill into law seven years later, on November 30, 1993. The Brady Bill, named after James Brady, the White House press secretary wounded in the 1981 attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan, required licensed firearms importers, manufacturers, or dealers to wait five business days before selling a handgun to a person not licensed under federal law. During the five-day waiting period, the local police chief was required to conduct a background investigation on the prospective purchaser, including research in state and local record-keeping systems and in a national system designated by the United States Attorney General, to determine the purchaser's eligibility to acquire the handgun. The Brady Bill also provided for exceptions to the five-day waiting period (known as the cooling off period).

Brewer v. Williams

Brewer v. Williams

Brewer v. Williams as a Leading U.S. Case

Brewer v. Williams is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Brewer v. Williams may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Brewer v. Williams tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Brewer v. Williams is also explained, together with the relevance of Brewer v. Williams impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Brewer v. Williams

430 U.S. 387 (1977)

Brown v. Mississippi

Brown v. Mississippi

Brown v. Mississippi as a Leading U.S. Case

Brown v. Mississippi is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Brown v. Mississippi may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Brown v. Mississippi tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Brown v. Mississippi is also explained, together with the relevance of Brown v. Mississippi impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Brown v. Mississippi

297 U.S. 278 (1936)

Broken Windows

Broken Windows

“Broken Windows” or Incivilities Thesis

In line with Ralph B. Taylor

about Broken Windows in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The term incivilities thesis refers to a family of closely related, exploratory, problem-solving techniques about the roles played by misdemeanors, uncivil and rowdy behaviors, some delinquent acts, and lack of property and facilities maintenance in urban communities (Taylor, 1999, 2001). Over the past quarter century, theorists and policymakers have enlarged the scope and nature of these roles. During this period of theoretical elaboration, advocates of this perspective have suggested relevant outcomes affected include individual and community fear levels, and changes therein; community crime rates, and changes in those rates; and whether neighborhoods remain stable or enter or accelerate a period of decline. This entry describes this theoretical growth process in brief; outlines shifting reasons behind its popularity; summarizes some criticisms made of these ideas; points to some ongoing areas of conceptual confusion; and highlights relevant, empirical supporting evidence. The seed sprouted in the mid-1970s.

Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al.

Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al.

Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al. as a Leading U.S. Case

Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al. is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al. may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al. tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al. is also explained, together with the relevance of Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al. impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al.

547 U.S. 47 (2006)