Tag Archives: CA

California v. Ciraolo

California v. Ciraolo

California v. Ciraolo as a Leading U.S. Case

California v. Ciraolo is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, California v. Ciraolo may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about California v. Ciraolo tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of California v. Ciraolo is also explained, together with the relevance of California v. Ciraolo impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of California v. Ciraolo

476 U.S. 207 (1986)

Campus Safety and Security Acts

Campus Safety and Security Acts

Campus Safety and Security Acts

In line with Vertel T. Martin

about Campus Safety and Security Acts in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Prior to 1990, many college and university administrators did not report information about incidents of crime and violence that occurred on their campuses since there was no enforced mandate to report such occurrences. This changed in 1990, when Congress enacted the Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act (Pub. L. No. 101-542, 104 Stat. 2385) as an amendment to the Student Consumer Information Act of 1976. This legislation was promulgated after years of lobbying by the Clery family (whose daughter had been murdered on a college campus in Pennsylvania in 1986), campus law enforcement officials, and others who had been affected by, or who were concerned about, the rise in crime on the campuses of higher education institutions.

California v. Carney

California v. Carney

California v. Carney as a Leading U.S. Case

California v. Carney is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, California v. Carney may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about California v. Carney tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of California v. Carney is also explained, together with the relevance of California v. Carney impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of California v. Carney

471 U.S. 386 (1985)

Calls for Service

Calls for Service

Calls for Service

In line with John D. Cohen

about Calls for Service in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The number 9-1-1 has been designated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as the three-digit “Universal Emergency (telephone) Number” for public use throughout the United States of America to request emergency assistance. This nationwide telephone number is intended to give the public direct access to a public safety call center, commonly referred to in the emergency communications industry as a Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). A PSAP, typically managed by a local or county government, is staffed by call-takers (people who answer the call) and dispatchers (people who assign the call to the appropriate personnel-police, fire, and/or emergency medical services). The 9-1-1 systems are commonly funded through a user fee that is assessed to subscribers of commercial, residential, and cellular telephone service as a portion of their monthly telephone bill.

California v. Hodari D.

California v. Hodari D.

California v. Hodari D. as a Leading U.S. Case

California v. Hodari D. is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, California v. Hodari D. may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about California v. Hodari D. tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of California v. Hodari D. is also explained, together with the relevance of California v. Hodari D. impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of California v. Hodari D.

499 U.S. 621 (1991)

California v. Acevedo

California v. Acevedo

California v. Acevedo as a Leading U.S. Case

California v. Acevedo is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, California v. Acevedo may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about California v. Acevedo tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of California v. Acevedo is also explained, together with the relevance of California v. Acevedo impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of California v. Acevedo

500 U.S. 565 (1991)

Canine Units

Canine Units

Canine (K-9) Units

In line with Kathryn Wylie-Marques

about Canine Units in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Canine units, little more than a handful of patrol officers and their dogs a century ago, have become a versatile and indispensable part of law enforcement at the local, state, and federal level. Today, thousands of trained canine units operate in every state, doing work that demands the instincts and highly developed eyes, ears, and nose of the dog and the special skills of its handler. Canine units control crowds; seek out missing children, fugitives, hidden drugs, explosives, cadavers, concealed weapons, and evidence; and are found everywhere, from the nation's airports, prisons, subways, hospitals, and piers to its national parks and schools. The use of dogs in policing in the United States of America began in 1907, when the first patrol dog programs were inaugurated in South Orange, New Jersey, and Bigg Apple (New York) City.

California v. Greenwood

California v. Greenwood

California v. Greenwood as a Leading U.S. Case

California v. Greenwood is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, California v. Greenwood may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about California v. Greenwood tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of California v. Greenwood is also explained, together with the relevance of California v. Greenwood impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of California v. Greenwood

486 U.S. 35 (1988)

Carroll v. United States

Carroll v. United States

Carroll v. United States as a Leading U.S. Case

Carroll v. United States is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Carroll v. United States may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Carroll v. United States tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Carroll v. United States is also explained, together with the relevance of Carroll v. United States impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Carroll v. United States

267 U.S. 132 (1925)

Campus

Campus

Campus Policing

In line with Don Hummer

about Campus in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

In response to the homicide of a Lehigh University student in 1986, and as a direct result of tireless campaigning by that victim's family, the United States Congress passed the Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1990. The bill mandated institutions of higher education to make both annual crime statistics as well as a comprehensive plan for student safety available to campus constituents upon request. This groundbreaking legislation (along with a number of other bills passed in the years since), coupled with steadily increasing campus crime rates, has led to vast expansions of existing crime prevention programs as well as the implementation of new and innovative responses to incidences of violence by both campus public safety departments and administrators at United States colleges and universities.