Tag Archives: DI

Dispatch

Leave a reply

Dispatch

Dispatch

In line with Tod W. Burke

about Dispatch in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

“If I had a choice between a two-way radio and a gun, I'd take the radio.” The above quote is from a former Maryland police officer and reflects the importance of the dispatcher. Although the role of the dispatcher is critical for the survival of law enforcement officers and the citizens who call upon them, administrators, officers, and citizens often misunderstand dispatchers. Dispatchers must process complex information in a matter of seconds to ascertain nonemergency from emergency calls. They must attempt to calm the caller, as some may be in great panic and unintelligible. The dispatcher must determine the nature of the problem and the location of the incident, and inquire if anyone has been injured.

Dickerson v. United States

Leave a reply

Dickerson v. United States

Dickerson v. United States as a Leading U.S. Case

Dickerson v. United States is one of the leading United States Supreme Court decisions impacting law enforcement in the United States, and, in this regards, Dickerson v. United States may be a case reference for attorneys and police officers. As a leading case, this entry about Dickerson v. United States tries to include facts, relevant legal issues, and the Court's decision and reasoning. The significance of Dickerson v. United States is also explained, together with the relevance of Dickerson v. United States impact on citizens and law enforcement.

Citation of Dickerson v. United States

530 U.S. 428 (2000)

Discretion

Leave a reply

Discretion

Police Discretion

In line with Michael S. Scott

about Discretion in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

Police officers exercise a tremendous amount of discretion in carrying out their functions. That is, they make many choices from a range of possible actions or inactions available to them that are not specifically prescribed by law. This simple notion, that seems self-evident to some and controversial to others, lies at the heart of many issues of policing in democratic societies. That police do exercise discretion was only openly acknowledged beginning in the 1960s. The conventional views prior to that time, and persisting among some long thereafter, was that the police function was entirely a ministerial one, that police took only those actions specifically authorized or mandated by legislative bodies. Under this view, policing was understood to be simply a matter of enforcing the laws on the books.

Diplomatic Security Service

Leave a reply

Diplomatic Security Service

Diplomatic Security Service

In line with Sanford Wexler

about Diplomatic Security Service in the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement:

The Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) is a little known law enforcement agency within the United States Department of State. Its primary mission is to protect United States personnel, property, and information at embassies and missions around the world. In the United States of America, the DSS safeguards the secretary of state, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, and foreign dignitaries below the head-of-state level. The agency also responds to terrorist attacks against Americans overseas, investigates passport and visa fraud, and issues security clearances to Department of State employees. The origins of the DSS date back to the period shortly before World War I. At that time, German and Austrian spies were engaged in espionage activities in the United States of America. The foreign agents were using forged or stolen identity papers. President Woodrow Wilson authorized the secretary of state to form a security agency within the Department of State.